People are studying at least three ways of reducing the amount of CO2 released during the production of concrete (WSJ, Feb. 2020). What would more often result in the efficient choices between the three options, a pollution tax or government officials deciding the "best" way to reduce CO2 in the atmosphere?
Edward Millner's blog. It contains links to articles for students taking Principles of Microeconomics and Managerial Economics. It also contains links to articles about politics. The opinions here are mine. No one at VCU reviews or approves what I post.
Wednesday, February 12, 2020
Two ways to reduce the impact of humans on climate change
People are studying at least three ways of reducing the amount of CO2 released during the production of concrete (WSJ, Feb. 2020). What would more often result in the efficient choices between the three options, a pollution tax or government officials deciding the "best" way to reduce CO2 in the atmosphere?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment